This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Prelec, D. Articles by Loewenstein, G. Search for Related Content

The Red and the Black: Mental Accounting of Savings and Debt

Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, E56-320, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

In the standard economic account of consumer behavior the cost of a purchase takes the form of a reduction in future utility when expenditures that otherwise could have been made are forgone. The reality of consumer hedonics is different. When people make purchases, they often experience an immediate pain of paying, which can undermine the pleasure derived from consumption. The ticking of the taxi meter, for example, reduces one's pleasure from the ride. We propose a "double-entry" mental accounting theory that describes the nature of these reciprocal interactions between the pleasure of consumption and the pain of paying and draws out their implications for consumer behavior and hedonics. A central assumption of the model, which we call prospective accounting, is that consumption that has already been paid for can be enjoyed as if it were free and that the pain associated with payments made prior to consumption (but not after) is buffered by thoughts of the benefits that the payments will finance. Another important concept is coupling, which refers to the degree to which consumption calls to mind thoughts of payment, and vice versa. Some financing methods, such as credit cards, tend to weaken coupling, whereas others, such as cash payment, produce tight coupling.

Our model makes a variety of predictions that are at variance with economic formulations. Contrary to the standard prediction that people will finance purchases to minimize the present value of payments, our model predicts strong debt aversion—that they should prefer to prepay for consumption or to get paid for work after it is performed. Such pay-before sequences confer hedonic benefits because consumption can be enjoyed without thinking about the need to pay for it in the future. Likewise, when paying beforehand, the pain of paying is mitigated by thoughts of future consumption benefits. Contrary to the economic prediction that consumers should prefer to pay, at the margin, for what they consume, our model predicts that consumers will find it less painful to pay for, and hence will prefer, flat-rate pricing schemes such as unlimited Internet access at a fixed monthly price, even if it involves paying more for the same usage. Other predictions concern spending patterns with cash, charge, or credit cards, and preferences for the earmarking of purchases.

We test these predictions in a series of surveys and in a conjoint-like analysis that pitted our double-entry mental accounting model against a standard discounting formulation and another benchmark that did not incorporate hedonic interactions between consumption and payments. Our model provides a better fit of the data for 60% of the subjects; the discounting formulation provides a better fit for only 29% of the subjects (even when allowing for positive and negative discount rates).

The pain of paying, we argue, plays an important role in consumer self-regulation, but is hedonically costly. From a hedonic perspective the ideal situation is one in which payments are tightly coupled to consumption (so that paying evokes thoughts about the benefits being financed) but consumption is decoupled from payments (so that consumption does not evoke thoughts about payment). From an efficiency perspective, however, it is important for consumers to be aware of what they are paying for consumption. This creates a tension between hedonic efficiency and what we call decision efficiency. Various institutional arrangements, such as financing of public parks through taxes or usage fees, play into this tradeoff. A producer developing a pricing structure for their product or service should be aware of these two conflicting objectives, and should try to devise a structure that reconciles them.

Key Words: Mental Accounting; Framing; Consumer Choice

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Talmi, P. Dayan, S. J. Kiebel, C. D. Frith, and R. J. Dolan How Humans Integrate the Prospects of Pain and Reward during Choice J. Neurosci., November 18, 2009; 29(46): 14617 - 14626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Bertini and L. Wathieu Research Note--Attention Arousal Through Price Partitioning Marketing Science, March 1, 2008; 27(2): 236 - 246. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Shampanier, N. Mazar, and D. Ariely Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products Marketing Science, November 1, 2007; 26(6): 742 - 757. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Kivetz The Effects of Effort and Intrinsic Motivation on Risky Choice Marketing Science, January 1, 2003; 22(4): 477 - 502. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Soman and A. Cheema The Effect of Credit on Spending Decisions: The Role of the Credit Limit and Credibility Marketing Science, January 1, 2002; 21(1): 32 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Chen and A. R. Rao Close Encounters of Two Kinds: False Alarms and Dashed Hopes Marketing Science, January 1, 2002; 21(2): 178 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. T. Anderson and D. I. Simester Research Note: Price Discrimination as an Adverse Signal: Why an Offer to Spread Payments May Hurt Demand Marketing Science, January 1, 2001; 20(3): 315 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. L. Ott and D. M. Andrus The Effect of Personal Property Taxes on Consumer Vehicle-Purchasing Decisions: A Partitioned Price/Mental Accounting Theory Analysis Public Finance Review, March 1, 2000; 28(2): 134 - 152. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Wertenbroch Consumption Self-Control by Rationing Purchase Quantities of Virtue and Vice Marketing Science, January 1, 1998; 17(4): 317 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF]