Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 23, No. 2, Spring 2004, pp. 173-179
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1040.0078
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shugan, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Editorial: Consulting, Research, and Consulting Research

Steven M. Shugan

Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Bryan Hall, Box 117155, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7150
steven.shugan{at}cba.ufl.edu

Consulting and scholarly research often have very different objectives with respect to advancements in practice, theory, and observation (e.g., data collections). For example, consulting often emphasizes immediate benefits, specialized applications, and a focus on only the key variables. Scholarly research often emphasizes replicability, generalizability, and introducing previously uninvestigated variables. However, these activities complement each other, and each activity is important for the advancement of the other. Benefiting from that complementarity requires the literature to bridge knowledge gained from each activity. It is unnecessary for every researcher to try to bridge theory and practice by working on the interface between academics and practice. However, it is critical that some researchers do so. This issue of Marketing Science examines several excellent applications of Marketing Science that provide detailed microexaminations of the fundamental marketing practices that we seek to understand and improve.

Beyond demonstrating how to solve specific problems in practice, in my opinion, the articles and commentaries in this issue also illustrate at least the following ideas: Short-term tactics can produce significant short-term advantages. Existing models in the literature can be useful with proper implementation. State-of-the-art research is most useful for infrequent decisions. Finally, knowing the decision-making context is essential for determining which variables to include in the analysis.

Key Words: marketing models; scholarly research; industry practice; academic consulting; theory



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
V. Mittal, L. Feick, and F. Murshed
Publish and Prosper: The Financial Impact of Publishing by Marketing Faculty
Marketing Science, May 1, 2008; 27(3): 430 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Cross Cultural ManagementHome page
M. Mohe
Bridging the Cultural Gap in Management Consulting Research
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, April 1, 2008; 8(1): 41 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
J. R. Hauser and S. M. Shugan
Commentary--Defensive Marketing Strategies
Marketing Science, January 1, 2008; 27(1): 85 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial It's the Findings, Stupid, Not the Assumptions
Marketing Science, July 1, 2007; 26(4): 449 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial: Fifty Years of Marketing Science
Marketing Science, November 1, 2006; 25(6): 551 - 555.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial: Save Research--Abandon the Case Method of Teaching
Marketing Science, March 1, 2006; 25(2): 109 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.