Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 24, No. 1, Winter 2005, pp. 3-7
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1040.0114
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shugan, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Comments on Competitive Responsiveness

Steven M. Shugan

Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, 201 Bryan Hall, Box 117155, Gainesville, Florida 32611-7155
steven.shugan{at}cba.ufl.edu

Marketing Science features many and diverse articles that analyze competitive responsiveness. Although recent Marketing Science editorials (e.g., Shugan 2002) suggest that competitive responsiveness is only a part of a comprehensive competitive marketing strategy, it remains a vital part. For that reason and many others, Marketing Science is particularly proud of this special issue edited by David J. Reibstein and Dick R. Wittink.

Before introducing and vigorously applauding both the editors and authors of this excellent special issue, we emphasize that competitive responsiveness raises numerous issues, including whether one can forecast outcomes of new policies based on past observations made under old policies (i.e., the Lucas critique) and decisions regarding which variables should be considered endogenous (Shugan 2004), i.e., determined within the model.

Perhaps, normative models are inherently perishable—evolution in market structure requires modifications over time. Also, although complete consistency within the world of the model is aesthetically pleasing, imposing industry-specific exogenous constraints (that might appear unrelated to the modeling assumptions) is sometimes necessary.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Commentary--Relevancy Is Robust Prediction, Not Alleged Realism
Marketing Science, September 1, 2009; 28(5): 991 - 998.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
J. R. Hauser and S. M. Shugan
Commentary--Defensive Marketing Strategies
Marketing Science, January 1, 2008; 27(1): 85 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
H. Van Heerde, K. Helsen, and M. G. Dekimpe
The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Marketing Effectiveness
Marketing Science, March 1, 2007; 26(2): 230 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial: Fifty Years of Marketing Science
Marketing Science, November 1, 2006; 25(6): 551 - 555.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.