Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 24, No. 1, Winter 2005, pp. 55-66
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1040.0064
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Debruyne, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reibstein, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Competitor See, Competitor Do: Incumbent Entry in New Market Niches

Marion Debruyne, David J. Reibstein

Goizueta Business School, Emory University, 1300 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 700 Jon M. Huntsman Hall, 3730 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

marion_debruyne{at}bus.emory.edu
reibstein{at}wharton.upenn.edu

The ability to keep up with changing technology is critical for a company's long-term survival. However, companies have to balance the risk of rushing into new areas and potentially cannibalizing their existing business against the risk of missing the emerging market. This paper investigates when incumbents enter into new market niches created by technological innovation. We argue that market conditions and company-specific characteristics do not suffice to explain incumbents' entry timing, but that entry is a contagious process. Our results demonstrate that incumbents are more likely to respond to innovations in their industry when their counterparts do so. In particular, we show that incumbents are affected by the entry of firms that are similar in size and resources. When a highly similar company enters the new market, it raises the probability that the company enters itself beyond levels based solely on the attractiveness of the market.

Key Words: market entry; competition; new product research
History: Received: December 26, 2001;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
H. E. Kim and J. M. Pennings
Innovation and Strategic Renewal in Mature Markets: A Study of the Tennis Racket Industry
Organization Science, March 1, 2009; 20(2): 368 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
P. Manchanda, Y. Xie, and N. Youn
The Role of Targeted Communication and Contagion in Product Adoption
Marketing Science, November 1, 2008; 27(6): 961 - 976.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
Y. Liu, S. Gupta, and Z. J. Zhang
Note on Self-Restraint as an Online Entry-Deterrence Strategy
Management Science, November 1, 2006; 52(11): 1799 - 1809.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
W. Jank and P. K. Kannan
Understanding Geographical Markets of Online Firms Using Spatial Models of Customer Choice
Marketing Science, January 1, 2005; 24(4): 623 - 634.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by INFORMS.