Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 25, No. 1, January-February 2006, pp. 1-7
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0196
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shugan, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Editorial—Are Consumers Rational? Experimental Evidence?

Steven M. Shugan

Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, 201 Bryan Hall, Box 117155, Gainesville, Florida 32611
steven.shugan{at}cba.ufl.edu

Despite some misconceptions, consumer rationality is a property of the researcher rather than the consumer. Consumers become more rational as we are better able to predict their behavior or other important outcomes influenced by their behavior. Perfect rationality results when we achieve accurate predictions. Consequently, at least for many Marketing Science articles, consumers are becoming more rational as we find better ways to predict. However, some experimental consumer behavior articles find the opposite. The difference between experimental and statistical controls explains the divergence in conclusions. Experimental controls test rationality based on whether previously absent variables exhibit significant explanatory power holding known explanatory variables constant. Statistical controls test rationality based on the incremental explanatory power of previously absent variables after accounting for known explanatory variables. Moreover, experimental tests tend to isolate consumer behavior predictions while statistical tests check for sufficient accuracy to choose among different firm strategies. Both perspectives are correct but ask very different questions.

Key Words: bounded rationality; experiments; predicted choice; consumption; consumer behavior; econometrics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal Of Vacation MarketingHome page
A. Palmer and S. Boissy
The effects of airline price presentations on buyers' choice
Journal of Vacation Marketing, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 39 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
F. S. Machado and R. K. Sinha
Smoking Cessation: A Model of Planned vs. Actual Behavior for Time-Inconsistent Consumers
Marketing Science, November 1, 2007; 26(6): 834 - 850.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
H. Mishra, A. Mishra, and D. Nayakankuppam
Seeing Through the Heart's Eye: The Interference of System 1 in System 2
Marketing Science, September 1, 2007; 26(5): 666 - 678.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.