|
|
||||||||
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5015
Firms often differentiate their product lines vertically to capture consumers differential willingness to pay for quality. Additionally, many firms offer products varying not in quality but in characteristics such as scent, color, or flavor, that relate to horizontal differentiation. For example, in the yogurt category, each manufacturer carries several product lines differing in quality and price, but within each line there is an assortment of flavors that is uniformly priced.
To better understand these product-line pricing strategies, we address two key issues. First, how do consumers perceive product-line and flavor attributes? Second, given consumers preferences, is the current strategy of pricing product lines differently, but offering all flavors within a product line at the same price, optimal?
We find that consumers value line attributes more than flavor attributes. Our analysis reveals that firms exploit these differences in consumer preferences by using product lines as a price discrimination tool. However, firms profits would not significantly increase if they were to price flavors within a product line differently. Therefore, the current pricing policy of setting different prices for product lines, but uniform prices for all flavors within a line, appears to be on target.
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208-2001
draganska_michaela{at}gsb.stanford.edu
d-jain{at}kellogg.northwestern.edu
History: Received: June 13, 2001;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. P. Cachon, C. Terwiesch, and Y. Xu On the Effects of Consumer Search and Firm Entry in a Multiproduct Competitive Market Marketing Science, May 1, 2008; 27(3): 461 - 473. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sriram, P. K. Chintagunta, and R. Neelamegham Effects of Brand Preference, Product Attributes, and Marketing Mix Variables in Technology Product Markets Marketing Science, September 1, 2006; 25(5): 440 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |