Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 25, No. 5, September-October 2006, pp. 477-493
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0209
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Palmatier, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Houston, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Returns on Business-to-Business Relationship Marketing Investments: Strategies for Leveraging Profits

Robert W. Palmatier, Srinath Gopalakrishna, Mark B. Houston

University of Cincinnati, 422 Carl Linder Hall, P.O. Box 210145, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
University of Missouri–Columbia, 434 Cornell Hall, Columbia, Missouri 65211
University of Missouri–Columbia, 339 Cornell Hall, Columbia, Missouri 65211

rob.palmatier{at}uc.edu
srinath{at}missouri.edu
houstonmb{at}missouri.edu

Firms invest heavily in different types of business-to-business relationship marketing activities in the belief that such programs bolster their bottom line. In this study, we develop and test a conceptual model that links customer-specific relationship marketing investments to short-term, customer-specific financial outcomes. Data from a matched set of 313 business customers covered by 143 salespeople of 34 selling firms indicate that investments in social relationship marketing pay off handsomely, financial relationship marketing investments do not, and structural relationship marketing investments are economically viable for customers serviced frequently. We conceptualize relationship marketing in a context involving nested participants (customers, salespeople, selling firms) and employ a hierarchical linear modeling approach to account for observations that are not independent. Across the three hierarchical levels, the impact of the financial, social, and structural components of relationship marketing investments and the potential moderating factors offer valuable insights into contextual factors and managerial strategies for leveraging relationship marketing investments. In an attempt to suggest normative guidelines to managers, we extend our analysis to a simple resource allocation model that describes the optimal mix of relationship marketing resources based on firm strategies.

Key Words: relationship marketing; customer relationship management; marketing strategy; financial outcomes; allocation; hierarchical linear modeling
History: Received: July 29, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
D. A. Schweidel, P. S. Fader, and E. T. Bradlow
A Bivariate Timing Model of Customer Acquisition and Retention
Marketing Science, September 1, 2008; 27(5): 829 - 843.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial: Does Good Marketing Cause Bad Unemployment?
Marketing Science, January 1, 2007; 26(1): 1 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.