Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 25, No. 6, November-December 2006, pp. 687-717
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1050.0144
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hauser, J.
Right arrow Articles by Griffin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science

John Hauser, Gerard J. Tellis, Abbie Griffin

MIT, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 38 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142-1307
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0443
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1206 South 6th Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820

jhauser{at}mit.edu
tellis{at}usc.edu
abbieg{at}uiuc.edu

Innovation is one of the most important issues in business research today. It has been studied in many independent research traditions. Our understanding and study of innovation can benefit from an integrative review of these research traditions. In so doing, we identify 16 topics relevant to marketing science, which we classify under five research fields:

For each topic, we summarize key concepts and highlight research challenges. For prescriptive research topics, we also review current thinking and applications. For descriptive topics, we review key findings.

Key Words: innovation; new products; consumer innovativeness; diffusion models; network externalities; strategic entry; defensive strategy; ideation; rewards to entrants; metrics
History: Received: October 6, 2004;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
R. Sankaranarayanan
Innovation and the Durable Goods Monopolist: The Optimality of Frequent New-Version Releases
Marketing Science, November 1, 2007; 26(6): 774 - 791.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial It's the Findings, Stupid, Not the Assumptions
Marketing Science, July 1, 2007; 26(4): 449 - 459.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial--The Anna Karenina Bias: Which Variables to Observe?
Marketing Science, March 1, 2007; 26(2): 145 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. M. Shugan
Editorial: Does Good Marketing Cause Bad Unemployment?
Marketing Science, January 1, 2007; 26(1): 1 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.