Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 26, No. 1, January-February 2007, pp. 101-117
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0216
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Netessine, S.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Product Line Design and Production Technology

Serguei Netessine, Terry A. Taylor

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, and Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755

netessine{at}wharton.upenn.edu
tat2002{at}columbia.edu

In this paper we characterize the impact of production technology on the optimal product line design. We analyze a problem in which a manufacturer segments the market on quality attributes and offers products that are partial substitutes. Because consumers self-select from the product line, product cannibalization is an issue. In addition, the manufacturer sets a production schedule in order to balance production setups with accumulation of inventories in the presence of economies of scale. We show that simultaneous optimization of the product line design and production schedule leads to insights that differ significantly from the common intuition and assertions in the literature, which omits either the demand side or the supply side of the equation. In particular, we demonstrate that more expensive production technology always leads to lower product prices and may at the same time lead to higher quality products. Further, a less efficient production technology does not necessarily increase total production costs or reduce consumer welfare. We also demonstrate that in the presence of production technology, the demand cannibalization problem may distort product quality upward or the number of products upward, which is contrary to the standard result.

Key Words: product line; segmentation; cannibalization; EOQ; scale economies; marketing-manufacturing interface
History: Received: March 14, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
S. Balachander and A. Stock
Limited Edition Products: When and When Not to Offer Them
Marketing Science, March 1, 2009; 28(2): 336 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
H. Mendelson and A. K. Parlakturk
Product-Line Competition: Customization vs. Proliferation
Management Science, December 1, 2008; 54(12): 2039 - 2053.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
MSOMHome page
A. Alptekinoglu and C. J. Corbett
Mass Customization vs. Mass Production: Variety and Price Competition
MSOM, January 1, 2008; 10(2): 204 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.