Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 26, No. 1, January-February 2007, pp. 130-141
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0212
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chessa, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Murre, J. M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Neurocognitive Model of Advertisement Content and Brand Name Recall

Antonio G. Chessa, Jaap M. J. Murre

Statistics Netherlands (CBS), P.O. Box 4000, 2270 JM, Voorburg, The Netherlands
Department of Psychonomy, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands

antoniogchessa{at}yahoo.com
jaap{at}murre.com

We introduce a new (point process) model of learning and forgetting, inspired by the structures of the brain, that we apply to model long-term memory for advertising and brand name recall. Recall-probability functions derived from the model are tested with classic data by Zielske (1959), as well as advertisement content and brand name recall data of a Dutch study that tracked over 40 campaigns of TV commercials. Data fits and cross-validation results indicate that the recall functions serve as a good first approximation for aggregate behavior. The shapes of optimal GRP schedules, which are obtained by maximizing a recall measure, are strongly related to the model parameters and corresponding memory processes. Comparisons with existing models in the literature indicate that a neurobiologically motivated model may give a more realistic description of memory for advertisements.

Key Words: advertising; memory; impact; scheduling; bursting; dripping; massed and spaced learning; point processes
History: Received: May 28, 2003;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
D. Godes, E. Ofek, and M. Sarvary
Content vs. Advertising: The Impact of Competition on Media Firm Strategy
Marketing Science, January 1, 2009; 28(1): 20 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
N. I. Bruce
Pooling and Dynamic Forgetting Effects in Multitheme Advertising: Tracking the Advertising Sales Relationship with Particle Filters
Marketing Science, July 1, 2008; 27(4): 659 - 673.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.