Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 26, No. 1, January-February 2007, pp. 83-100
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0207
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pauwels, K.
Right arrow Articles by Franses, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

When Do Price Thresholds Matter in Retail Categories?

Koen Pauwels, Shuba Srinivasan, Philip Hans Franses

Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, 100 Tuck Drive, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
The A. Gary Anderson School of Management, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
Econometric Institute and Department of Business Economics, H11-34, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

koen.h.pauwels{at}dartmouth.edu
shuba.srinivasan{at}ucr.edu
franses{at}few.eur.nl

Marketing literature has long recognized that brand price elasticity need not be monotonic and symmetric, but has yet to provide generalizable market-level insights on threshold-based price elasticity, asymmetric thresholds, and the sign and magnitude of elasticity transitions. This paper introduces smooth transition regression models to study threshold-based price elasticity of the top 4 brands across 20 fast-moving consumer good categories. Threshold-based price elasticity is found for 76% of all brands: 29% reflect historical benchmark prices, 16% reflect competitive benchmark prices, and 31% reflect both types of benchmarks. The authors demonstrate asymmetry for gains versus losses on three levels: the threshold size and the sign and the magnitude of the elasticity difference. Interestingly, they observe latitude of acceptance for gains compared to the historical benchmark, but saturation effects in most other cases. Moreover, category characteristics influence the extent and the nature of threshold-based price elasticity, while individual brand characteristics impact the size of the price thresholds. From a managerial perspective, the paper illustrates the sales, revenue, and margin implications for price changes typically observed in consumer markets.

Key Words: kinked demand curve; smooth-transition regression models; time-series analysis; asymmetric price thresholds; empirical generalizations
History: Received: February 8, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
G. M. Allenby, M. J. Garratt, and P. E. Rossi
A Model for Trade-Up and Change in Considered Brands
Marketing Science, January 1, 2010; 29(1): 40 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
B. J. Bronnenberg, M. W. Kruger, and C. F. Mela
Database Paper--The IRI Marketing Data Set
Marketing Science, July 1, 2008; 27(4): 745 - 748.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.