This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Van den Bulte, C. Articles by Joshi, Y. V. Search for Related Content

New Product Diffusion with Influentials and Imitators

The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
vdbulte{at}wharton.upenn.edu
yogesh{at}wharton.upenn.edu

We model the diffusion of innovations in markets with two segments: influentials who are more in touch with new developments and who affect another segment of imitators whose own adoptions do not affect the influentials. This two-segment structure with asymmetric influence is consistent with several theories in sociology and diffusion research, as well as many "viral" or "network" marketing strategies. We have four main results. (1) Diffusion in a mixture of influentials and imitators can exhibit a dip or "chasm" between the early and later parts of the diffusion curve. (2) The proportion of adoptions stemming from influentials need not decrease monotonically, but may first decrease and then increase. (3) Erroneously specifying a mixed-influence model to a mixture process where influentials act independently from each other can generate systematic changes in the parameter values reported in earlier research. (4) Empirical analysis of 33 different data series indicates that the two-segment model fits better than the standard mixed-influence, the Gamma/Shifted Gompertz, and the Weibull-Gamma models, especially in cases where a two-segment structure is likely to exist. Also, the two-segment model fits about as well as the Karmeshu-Goswami mixed-influence model, in which the coefficients of innovation and imitation vary across potential adopters in a continuous fashion.

Key Words: asymmetric influence; diffusion of innovations; innovation; market segments; social contagion; social structure
History: Received: July 18, 2005;

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. V. Joshi, D. J. Reibstein, and Z. J. Zhang Optimal Entry Timing in Markets with Social Influence Management Science, June 1, 2009; 55(6): 926 - 939. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. H. Seog and Y. J. Hyun Financing as a Marketing Strategy Marketing Science, May 1, 2009; 28(3): 526 - 540. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Goldenberg, O. Lowengart, and D. Shapira Zooming In: Self-Emergence of Movements in New Product Growth Marketing Science, March 1, 2009; 28(2): 274 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X. Luo Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices Marketing Science, January 1, 2009; 28(1): 148 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. B. Ataman, C. F. Mela, and H. J. van Heerde Building Brands Marketing Science, November 1, 2008; 27(6): 1036 - 1054. [Abstract] [PDF]