Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 26, No. 6, November-December 2007, pp. 742-757
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0254
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shampanier, K.
Right arrow Articles by Ariely, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products

Kristina Shampanier, Nina Mazar, Dan Ariely

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 38 Memorial Drive, E56-311, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 105 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3E6, Canada
Duke University, One Towerview Road, Durham, North Carolina 27708

kshampan{at}mit.edu
nina.mazar{at}utoronto.ca
dandan{at}duke.edu

When faced with a choice of selecting one of several available products (or possibly buying nothing), according to standard theoretical perspectives, people will choose the option with the highest cost–benefit difference. However, we propose that decisions about free (zero price) products differ, in that people do not simply subtract costs from benefits but instead they perceive the benefits associated with free products as higher.

We test this proposal by contrasting demand for two products across conditions that maintain the price difference between the goods, but vary the prices such that the cheaper good in the set is priced at either a low positive or zero price. In contrast with a standard cost–benefit perspective, in the zero-price condition, dramatically more participants choose the cheaper option, whereas dramatically fewer participants choose the more expensive option. Thus, people appear to act as if zero pricing of a good not only decreases its cost, but also adds to its benefits. After documenting this basic effect, we propose and test several psychological antecedents of the effect, including social norms, mapping difficulty, and affect. Affect emerges as the most likely account for the effect.

Key Words: free; zero; affect; pricing
History: Received: December 14, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
B. Maciejovsky, D. V. Budescu, and D. Ariely
Research Note--The Researcher as a Consumer of Scientific Publications: How Do Name-Ordering Conventions Affect Inferences About Contribution Credits?
Marketing Science, May 1, 2009; 28(3): 589 - 598.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.