Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE
Vol. 26, No. 6, November-December 2007, pp. 876-898
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.1060.0242
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McAlister, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Comment—Cross-Brand Pass-Through: Fact or Artifact?

Leigh McAlister

McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
leigh.mcalister{at}mccombs.utexas.edu

Cross-brand pass-through implies that a retailer responds to wholesale promotional support from a target brand by changing the retail prices of competitive brands. Besanko et al. (2005) model a target brand's retail price as a function of its own and other brands' wholesale prices using 780 observations (15 price zones x 52 weeks) and take the many significant coefficients for other brands' wholesale prices that they find as evidence of cross-brand pass-through. Because price zones do not react independently to wholesale prices when they set a brand's retail price, Besanko et al.'s (2005) estimation overstates the number of independent observations by a factor of 15. When we correct for this overstatement of independent observations, we find that the number of stable, significant coefficients for other brands' wholesale prices is lower than one would expect by chance. We conclude that there is no evidence of cross-brand pass-through in the 11 categories analyzed by Besanko et al. (2005).

Key Words: pricing; promotion; retailing and wholesaling; channels of distribution; econometric models; Dominick's; packaged goods; laundry detergent; price zones
History: Received: May 9, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
E. T. Bradlow
Editorial--Does Everything Not Being Resolved Equal Nothing Gained? Bringing in the Wisdom of the Academic Crowd
Marketing Science, September 1, 2009; 28(5): 809 - 809.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
K. L. Ailawadi and B. A. Harlam
Findings--Retailer Promotion Pass-Through: A Measure, Its Magnitude, and Its Determinants
Marketing Science, July 1, 2009; 28(4): 782 - 791.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
B. J. Bronnenberg, M. W. Kruger, and C. F. Mela
Database Paper--The IRI Marketing Data Set
Marketing Science, July 1, 2008; 27(4): 745 - 748.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
E. T. Bradlow
Editorial--The Scientific Process at Its Best
Marketing Science, May 1, 2008; 27(3): 323 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.