Marketing Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MARKETING SCIENCE,
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumar, V.
Right arrow Articles by Beckmann, D.

Practice Prize Report—The Power of CLV: Managing Customer Lifetime Value at IBM

V. Kumar, Rajkumar Venkatesan, Tim Bohling, Denise Beckmann

J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904
Americas Market Intelligence, IBM Corporation, New York 10589
Americas Market Intelligence, IBM Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia 30327

dr_vk{at}hotmail.com
venkatesanr{at}darden.virginia.edu
tbohling{at}us.ibm.com
dmbeck{at}us.ibm.com

Customer management activities at firms involve making consistent decisions over time, about: (a) which customers to select for targeting, (b) determining the level of resources to be allocated to the selected customers, and (c) selecting customers to be nurtured to increase future profitability. Measurement of customer profitability and a deep understanding of the link between firm actions and customer profitability are critical for ensuring the success of the above decisions. We present the case study of how IBM used customer lifetime value (CLV) as an indicator of customer profitability and allocated marketing resources based on CLV. CLV was used as a criterion for determining the level of marketing contacts through direct mail, telesales, e-mail, and catalogs for each customer. In a pilot study implemented for about 35,000 customers, this approach led to reallocation of resources for about 14% of the customers as compared to the allocation rules used previously (which were based on past spending history). The CLV-based resource reallocation led to an increase in revenue of about $20 million (a tenfold increase) without any changes in the level of marketing investment. Overall, the successful implementation of the CLV-based approach resulted in increased productivity from marketing investments. We also discuss the organizational and implementation challenges that surrounded the adoption of CLV in this firm.

Key Words: customer relationship management; customer lifetime value; field experiment; return on marketing contacts; missing value imputation
History: Received: September 21, 2006;





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.